Unborn Babys Father Has Chf

53,140 .506 Italians against vivisection - where we have failed?

Cinquantatremilioniquattordicimilacinquecentosei (!) Italians are against any form of animal testing. And even if we do not consider the population of residents without Italian citizenship, the figure would be still overwhelming. Who knows how to interpret this as our own MEPs (This Mortal Coil by David Sassuolo, passing through all intermediate alignments) that last September 8, incredible convoluted justifications, voted the Directive result of killing animals and vivisettrici lobby (not representative) bodies European Union policy.

No ifs, ands or buts. Italians when asked what they think of vivisection, simply throw in the trash. Even to think this way is much as 88%. And 'This is perhaps the most striking in the chapter entitled "Live Pet: pet and its" Value added in Italy 2011, released today dall'Eursispes. Is relevant as only 7.4% said they were quite tolerable to the animal testing (I wonder if I had set as vivisection ....) And only 8, 2% in favor.

I n summary means that the feelings of Italians towards a serious problem, such as that of vivisection, is stronger than the power of the mammoth array of clientele that is known to be able to generate the World Health and medication in particular.

A policy also dominated the small lobby, from the moment you can not even bring in a field law against animals in circuses (all but disappeared in the work of the Chamber of Deputies) with just 10.1% of Italians in favor of their use. A ridiculous but quantitatively will evidently unable to affect the choice of low profile that clearly make breakthrough on parliamentary afraid to take a position on everything. Just consider the elimination of the prohibition of amputation of the tail and ears of dogs that had been planned but in the initial drafting of the new law "puppies". Then amputated through, even to the hunting lobby in parliament.

In this regard. But many Italians still like hunters? Just 17.8%, while 23.9% like little and even to 56.6% for nothing. Yet we live in a country where all crimes are just hunting nature of contravention. If we shoot a protected species can continue to (by law) to do so, the moment to have suspended the license, you must return in the future to kill another species protected (... and of course to be caught). Let us then lose the fur, with just 14.1% in favor, without that in our country there is a minimal estimate of industry regulation of national flocks, but managed to bring into port a ban on seal skins and derivatives (Canadian) and cat and dog fur (because of scandal Chinese). One wonders

at this point are represented by those animals, at least in the parliamentary lobby. Why such sensitivity is no longer intercepted and used properly (for animals). (GEAPRESS)

ps: vegetarians and vegans are well 6.7%