On 09/09/2009, Having not been assigned a lawyer required regularly, I sent a reminder to the court of cassation. Following is the text, on receipt of the request demonstrates submit its claim.
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE ROME CASSAZIONE
SECTION CRIMINAL
SECOND REQUEST TO APPOINT DEFENCE lawyer
(art.613 3rd and 4th cpp)
The first inquiry was made on 03/04/2009 with the appeal of the decision of single judge in the light of the Court of Appeal of the Court of Genoa dr. N. Dagnino 13 A of 23/02/2009 filed the Court on 06.03.2009, circulated a notification received on 20/03/2009 and on 24/03/2009
Babenko Olga - homeless and homeless in cuase employment of the family home, located on Sixth street in Godano Merz 2, by a group of criminals and inactivity of the Prosecutor of La Spezia to vacate the property and to provide for under the law and security, and because denial of access to public services by the town of Sixth Godano,
Available via Preffetto of La Spezia (instance of 10/10/2008),
Tel: 340 27 41 271 (office hours, working days except Saturdays),
E-mail: olgababenko@yahoo.it
I, the undersigned, Babenko Olga, as a defendant / slandered in the original procedure N. 6403/03/21 RGNR a / N. 304/07 RGGDP magistrate at Genoa, which was implemented on the basis of the lawsuit and the content start false calunniatorio of Silvia Miano (social worker, can not graduate), Course Fiorella (operator), Paolo Gargano (driver) of 8.11 / 2003, I hereby inform you that until To date I have not been assigned a lawyer for my defense despite my explicit request submitted on 4/3/2009 which can lead to rejection or the injustice of dell'inamissibilità statement of my appeal. Ptrviso office that the lawyer assigned to me in the summons for trial gave up my defenses, going so far as to say "But the judge did not know that the witnesses were his and not his co-defendants" (!), And make gravisime other omissions, comparable with treason. The lawyer assigned to me was Franco Sturla of the Genoa Bar, which has entrusted the management of the case to a colleague Barbara Bracco, because it did not want to deal with personally responsible and broke it as a substitute. The
01/03/2009 I also asked to assign a lawyer to the Bar of Genoa on 18/03/2009 and I got the answer that the Order does not help the citizens when they remained without a lawyer and / or can not find a lawyer to his defense. I personally spent some lawyers and they all refused to accepted practice, giving me reason and at the same time confirming the misconduct of judges either first or second degree (omitted in the text pointer evidence in my favor, an indication of their fantasies and do not of the facts obtained during the hearings, aiding explicit the counterparty).
On 03/04/2009 I had to personally present the application to your Court against the sentence unjust and confrome the requirements prescribed by law for judgments based on hatred and racial equal treatment, in which there is no word of my version of the facts and the testimony of a police officer and two witnesses in my favor and against my party (the officer explicitly testified to the facts in my foreignness than indicated by a finger from the slanderous and not present on site), because the lawyer assigned office does not want to perform the duty of defense.
point out that amessa are already legal aid as the victim of the Italian crime resulting in loss of income.
With compliments,
Babenko Olga
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE ROME CASSAZIONE
SECTION CRIMINAL
SECOND REQUEST TO APPOINT DEFENCE lawyer
(art.613 3rd and 4th cpp)
The first inquiry was made on 03/04/2009 with the appeal of the decision of single judge in the light of the Court of Appeal of the Court of Genoa dr. N. Dagnino 13 A of 23/02/2009 filed the Court on 06.03.2009, circulated a notification received on 20/03/2009 and on 24/03/2009
Babenko Olga - homeless and homeless in cuase employment of the family home, located on Sixth street in Godano Merz 2, by a group of criminals and inactivity of the Prosecutor of La Spezia to vacate the property and to provide for under the law and security, and because denial of access to public services by the town of Sixth Godano,
Available via Preffetto of La Spezia (instance of 10/10/2008),
Tel: 340 27 41 271 (office hours, working days except Saturdays),
E-mail: olgababenko@yahoo.it
I, the undersigned, Babenko Olga, as a defendant / slandered in the original procedure N. 6403/03/21 RGNR a / N. 304/07 RGGDP magistrate at Genoa, which was implemented on the basis of the lawsuit and the content start false calunniatorio of Silvia Miano (social worker, can not graduate), Course Fiorella (operator), Paolo Gargano (driver) of 8.11 / 2003, I hereby inform you that until To date I have not been assigned a lawyer for my defense despite my explicit request submitted on 4/3/2009 which can lead to rejection or the injustice of dell'inamissibilità statement of my appeal. Ptrviso office that the lawyer assigned to me in the summons for trial gave up my defenses, going so far as to say "But the judge did not know that the witnesses were his and not his co-defendants" (!), And make gravisime other omissions, comparable with treason. The lawyer assigned to me was Franco Sturla of the Genoa Bar, which has entrusted the management of the case to a colleague Barbara Bracco, because it did not want to deal with personally responsible and broke it as a substitute. The
01/03/2009 I also asked to assign a lawyer to the Bar of Genoa on 18/03/2009 and I got the answer that the Order does not help the citizens when they remained without a lawyer and / or can not find a lawyer to his defense. I personally spent some lawyers and they all refused to accepted practice, giving me reason and at the same time confirming the misconduct of judges either first or second degree (omitted in the text pointer evidence in my favor, an indication of their fantasies and do not of the facts obtained during the hearings, aiding explicit the counterparty).
On 03/04/2009 I had to personally present the application to your Court against the sentence unjust and confrome the requirements prescribed by law for judgments based on hatred and racial equal treatment, in which there is no word of my version of the facts and the testimony of a police officer and two witnesses in my favor and against my party (the officer explicitly testified to the facts in my foreignness than indicated by a finger from the slanderous and not present on site), because the lawyer assigned office does not want to perform the duty of defense.
point out that amessa are already legal aid as the victim of the Italian crime resulting in loss of income.
With compliments,
Babenko Olga
